Acrux is the southern most star of the constellation Crux, the Southern Cross. Although the picture below probably gives the impression it is the Northern most of the stars, the picture is the wrong way up. Acrux is one of the brightest stars in the night sky, coming in at position thirteen and being one of the most in the Southern hemisphere.
Alpha Crucis (Alf01 Cru) is the Bayer Classification for the star. The Bayer Classification was created by Johann Bayer in 1603. The brightest star in the constellation is normally given the Alpha designation, there are exceptions such as Pollux which is Beta Geminorum.
The Id of the star in the Yale Bright Star Catalogue is HR4730. HIP60718 is the reference name for the star in the Hipparcos Star Catalogue. The Id of the star in the Henry Draper catalogue is HD108248.
More details on objects' alternative names can be found at Star Names .
The location of the subgiant star in the night sky is determined by the Right Ascension (R.A.) and Declination (Dec.), these are equivalent to the Longitude and Latitude on the Earth. The Right Ascension is how far expressed in time (hh:mm:ss) the star is along the celestial equator. If the R.A. is positive then its eastwards. The Declination is how far north or south the object is compared to the celestial equator and is expressed in degrees. For Acrux, the location is 12h 26m 35.94 and -63° 05` 56.6 .
All stars like planets orbit round a central spot, in the case of planets, its the central star such as the Sun. In the case of a star, its the galactic centre. The constellations that we see today will be different than they were 50,000 years ago or 50,000 years from now. Proper Motion details the movements of these stars and are measured in milliarcseconds. The star is moving -14.86 ± 0.36 milliarcseconds/year towards the north and -35.83 ± 0.50 milliarcseconds/year east if we saw them in the horizon.
The Radial Velocity, that is the speed at which the star is moving away/towards the Sun is 11.90000 km/s with an error of about 2.40 km/s . When the value is negative then the star and the Sun are getting closer to one another, likewise, a positive number means that two stars are moving away. Its nothing to fear as the stars are so far apart, they won't collide in our life-time, if ever.
Based on the star's spectral type of B0.5IV , Acrux's colour and type is blue subgiant star. The star's effective temperature is 24,000 Kelvin which is hotter than our own Sun's effective Temperature which is 5,777 Kelvin.
Luminosity is the amount of energy that a star pumps out and its relative to the amount that our star, the Sun gives out. The figure of 30,302.96 that I have given is based on the value in the Simbad Hipparcos Extended Catalogue at the University of Strasbourg from 2012.
Acrux Radius has been calculated as being 7.80 times bigger than the Sun. The Sun's radius is 695,800km, therefore the star's radius is an estimated 5,427,240.00.km. If you need the diameter of the star, you just need to multiple the radius by 2.
The Acrux's solar mass is 17.80 times that of our star, the Sun. The Sun's Mass is 1,989,100,000,000,000,000,000 billion kg. which to calculate using this website is too large. To give idea of size, the Sun is 99.86% the mass of the solar system.
Acrux has an apparent magnitude of 0.77 which is how bright we see the star from Earth. Apparent Magnitude is also known as Visual Magnitude. If you used the 1997 Parallax value, you would get an absolute magnitude of -4.19 If you used the 2007 Parallax value, you would get an absolute magnitude of -4.20. Magnitude, whether it be apparent/visual or absolute magnitude is measured by a number, the smaller the number, the brighter the Star is. Our own Sun is the brightest star and therefore has the lowest of all magnitudes, -26.74. A faint star will have a high number.
Using the original Hipparcos data that was released in 1997, the parallax to the star was given as 10.17000 which gave the calculated distance to Acrux as 320.71 light years away from Earth or 98.33 parsecs. If you want that in miles, it is about 1,885,333,943,433,715.56, based on 1 Ly = 5,878,625,373,183.61 miles.
In 2007, Hipparcos data was revised with a new parallax of 10.13000 which put Acrux at a distance of 321.98 light years or 98.72 parsecs. It should not be taken as though the star is moving closer or further away from us. It is purely that the distance was recalculated.
Using the 2007 distance, the star is roughly 20,362,319.79 Astronomical Units from the Earth/Sun give or take a few. An Astronomical Unit is the distance between Earth and the Sun. The number of A.U. is the number of times that the star is from the Earth compared to the Sun. The star's Galacto-Centric Distance is 7,351.00 Parsecs or 23,976.27 Light Years. The Galacto-Centric Distance is the distance from the star to the Centre of the Galaxy which is Sagittarius A*.
The time it will take to travel to this star is dependent on how fast you are going. U.G. has done some calculations as to how long it will take going at differing speeds. A note about the calculations, when I'm talking about years, I'm talking non-leap years only (365 days).
The New Horizons space probe is the fastest probe that we've sent into space at the time of writing. Its primary mission was to visit Pluto which at the time of launch (2006), Pluto was still a planet.
|Description||Speed (m.p.h.)||Time (years)|
|Speed of Sound (Mach 1)||767.269||281,420,391.29|
|Concorde (Mach 2)||1,534.54||140,710,012.25|
|New Horizons Probe||33,000||6,543,186.13|
|Speed of Light||670,616,629.00||321.98|
The source of the information if it has a Hip I.D. is from Simbad, the Hipparcos data library based at the University at Strasbourg, France. Hipparcos was a E.S.A. satellite operation launched in 1989 for four years. The items in red are values that I've calculated so they could well be wrong. Information regarding Metallicity and/or Mass is from the E.U. Exoplanets. The information was obtained as of 12th Feb 2017.
|Primary / Proper / Traditional Name||Acrux|
|Alternative Names||Alpha Crucis, Alf01 Cru, HD 108248, HIP 60718, HR 4730|
|Constellation's Main Star||Yes|
|Multiple Star System||Yes|
|Star Type||Subgiant Star|
|Absolute Magnitude||-4.19 / -4.20|
|Visual / Apparent Magnitude||0.77|
|Naked Eye Visible||Yes - Magnitudes|
|Right Ascension (R.A.)||12h 26m 35.94|
|Declination (Dec.)||-63° 05` 56.6|
|Galactic Latitude||-0.36267814 degrees|
|Galactic Longitude||300.12665439 degrees|
|1997 Distance from Earth||10.17000 Parallax (milliarcseconds)|
|320.71 Light Years|
|2007 Distance from Earth||10.13000 Parallax (milliarcseconds)|
|321.98 Light Years|
|20,362,319.79 Astronomical Units|
|Galacto-Centric Distance||23,976.27 Light Years / 7,351.00 Parsecs|
|Proper Motion Dec.||-14.86000 ± 0.36000 milliarcseconds/year|
|Proper Motion RA.||-35.83000 ± 0.50000 milliarcseconds/year|
|Radial Velocity||11.90000 ± 2.40 km/s|
|Stellar Luminosity (Lsun)||30302.9600000|
|Brightest in Night Sky||13th|
|Associated / Clustered Stars||Acrux B|
|Radius (x the Sun)||7.80|
|Effective Temperature||21,255 Kelvin|
|Mass Compared to the Sun||17.80|
The star has been identified as being a multi-star system, one in which there is at least one star in close orbit to another star or two or more stars orbiting a central point. The stars may be of equal mass, unequal mass where one star is stronger than the other or be in groups orbiting a central point which doesn't necessarily have to be a star. More information can be found on my dedicated multiple star systems page. The source of the info is Simbad. The file is dated 2000 so any differences between this and any other source will be down to the actual source from where the information came from.
|Proper Motion mas/yr|
|H.D. Id||B.D. Id||Star Code||Magnitude||R.A.||Dec.||Spectrum||Colour||Year|
The map was generated using Night Vision, an awesome free application by Brian Simpson.
There's no register feature and no need to give an email address if you don't need to. All messages will be reviewed before being displayed. Comments may be merged or altered slightly such as if an email address is given in the main body of the comment.
You can decline to give a name which if that is the case, the comment will be attributed to a random star. A name is preferred even if its a random made up one by yourself.