HIP75863 is the reference name for the star in the Hipparcos Star Catalogue. The Id of the star in the Henry Draper catalogue is HD137603.
More details on objects' alternative names can be found at Star Names .
The location of the wolf-rayet star in the night sky is determined by the Right Ascension (R.A.) and Declination (Dec.), these are equivalent to the Longitude and Latitude on the Earth. The Right Ascension is how far expressed in time (hh:mm:ss) the star is along the celestial equator. If the R.A. is positive then its eastwards. The Declination is how far north or south the object is compared to the celestial equator and is expressed in degrees. For WR 70, the location is 15h 29m 44.70 and -58° 34` 51.2 .
The star is a Wolf-Rayet, a rare type of star of which not many are known. These stars are extremely luminous and large compared to our Sun. They live fast and die hard in a matter of millions not billions of years like our Sun. They exhaust their hydrogen supplies, turning to other gasses and expand outwards with massive solar winds, moving a step closer in the stellar evolution towards their death in a super or hypernova explosion.
All stars like planets orbit round a central spot, in the case of planets, its the central star such as the Sun. In the case of a star, its the galactic centre. The constellations that we see today will be different than they were 50,000 years ago or 50,000 years from now. Proper Motion details the movements of these stars and are measured in milliarcseconds. The star is moving -3.46 ± 1.15 milliarcseconds/year towards the north and -3.27 ± 1.57 milliarcseconds/year east if we saw them in the horizon. . When the value is negative then the star and the Sun are getting closer to one another, likewise, a positive number means that two stars are moving away. Its nothing to fear as the stars are so far apart, they won't collide in our life-time, if ever.
WR 70 has a spectral type of WC+.... The star has a B-V Colour Index of 1.17 which means the star's temperature has been calculated using information from Morgans @ Uni.edu at being 4,624 Kelvin.
Radius has been calculated as being 16.94 times bigger than the Sun. The Sun's radius is 695,800km, therefore the star's radius is an estimated 11,785,701.01.km. If you need the diameter of the star, you just need to multiple the radius by 2. However with the 2007 release of updated Hipparcos files, the radius is now calculated at being round 9.44. The figure is derived at by using the formula from SDSS and has been known to produce widely incorrect figures.
WR 70 has an apparent magnitude of 9.74 which is how bright we see the star from Earth. Apparent Magnitude is also known as Visual Magnitude. If you used the 1997 Parallax value, you would get an absolute magnitude of -0.33 If you used the 2007 Parallax value, you would get an absolute magnitude of 0.94. Magnitude, whether it be apparent/visual or absolute magnitude is measured by a number, the smaller the number, the brighter the Star is. Our own Sun is the brightest star and therefore has the lowest of all magnitudes, -26.74. A faint star will have a high number.
Using the original Hipparcos data that was released in 1997, the parallax to the star was given as 0.97 which gave the calculated distance to WR 70 as 3362.51 light years away from Earth or 1030.93 parsecs. If you want that in miles, it is 11,019,483,262,032,658.20.
In 2007, Hipparcos data was revised with a new parallax of 1.74 which put WR 70 at a distance of 1874.50 light years or 574.71 parsecs. It should not be taken as though the star is moving closer or further away from us. It is purely that the distance was recalculated.
Using the 2007 distance, the star is roughly 118,541,620.79 Astronomical Units from the Earth/Sun give or take a few. An Astronomical Unit is the distance between Earth and the Sun. The number of A.U. is the number of times that the star is from the Earth compared to the Sun.
A note about the calculations, when I'm talking about years, I'm talking non-leap years only (365 days).
If you were to drive there at about 120 m.p.h. in a car with an infinity engine so you didn't have to pull over for petrol, it would take you 164,724,471,696,529.89 hours or 18,804,163,435.68 years.
At the time of writing, the fastest probe so far created is the New Horizon probe which is travelling at a speed of 33,000 m.p.h. If the probe was travelling to WR 70 then it would take 598,998,078,896.47 hours / 68,378,776.13 years to get there. Speed Ref: N.A.S.A.
It would to take a spaceship journey travelling at the speed of light, 3362.51 years to get there. We don't have the technology or spaceship that can carry people over that distance yet.
The source of the information if it has a Hip I.D. is from Simbad, the Hipparcos data library based at the University at Strasbourg, France. Hipparcos was a E.S.A. satellite operation launched in 1989 for four years. The items in red are values that I've calculated so they could well be wrong. Information regarding Metallicity and/or Mass is from the E.U. Exoplanets. The information was obtained as of 12th Feb 2017.
|Primary / Proper / Traditional Name||WR 70|
|Alternative Names||HD 137603, HIP 75863, WR 70|
|Constellation's Main Star||No|
|Multiple Star System||No / Unknown|
|Star Type||Wolf-Rayet star|
|Absolute Magnitude||-0.33 / 0.94|
|Visual / Apparent Magnitude||9.74|
|Naked Eye Visible||Requires a 7x50 Binoculars - Magnitudes|
|Right Ascension (R.A.)||15h 29m 44.70|
|Declination (Dec.)||-58° 34` 51.2|
|Galactic Latitude||-1.81 degrees|
|Galactic Longitude||322.34 degrees|
|1997 Distance from Earth||0.97 Parallax (milliarcseconds)|
|3362.51 Light Years|
|2007 Distance from Earth||1.74 Parallax (milliarcseconds)|
|1874.50 Light Years|
|118,541,620.79 Astronomical Units|
|Proper Motion Dec.||-3.46 ± 1.15 milliarcseconds/year|
|Proper Motion RA.||-3.27 ± 1.57 milliarcseconds/year|
|Radius (x the Sun)||9.44|
|Effective Temperature||4,624 Kelvin|
There's no register feature and no need to give an email address if you don't need to. All messages will be reviewed before being displayed. Comments may be merged or altered slightly such as if an email address is given in the main body of the comment.
You can decline to give a name which if that is the case, the comment will be attributed to a random star. A name is preferred even if its a random made up one by yourself.