Kleeia (Delta-3 Tauri) is a blue subgiant star that can be located in the constellation of Taurus. Kleeia is the brightest star in Taurus based on the Hipparcos 2007 apparent magnitude. The star can be seen with the naked eye, that is, you don't need a telescope/binoculars to see it.
Delta-3 Tauri is the Bayer Classification for the star. HIP20648 is the reference name for the star in the Hipparcos Star Catalogue. The Id of the star in the Henry Draper catalogue is HD27962.
Kleeia has alternative name(s), Delta-3 Tau,68 Tauri, Cleeia , .
The location of the star in the galaxy is determined by the Right Ascension (R.A.) and Declination (Dec.), these are equivalent to the Longitude and Latitude on the Earth. The Right Ascension is how far expressed in time (hh:mm:ss) the star is along the celestial equator. If the R.A. is positive then its eastwards. The Declination is how far north or south the star is compared to the celestial equator and is expressed in degrees. For Kleeia, the location is 04h 25m 29.32 and +17d55`40.8 .
All stars like planets orbit round a central spot, in the case of planets, its the central star such as the Sun. In the case of a star, its the galactic centre. The constellations that we see today will be different than they were 50,000 years ago or 50,000 years from now. Proper Motion details the movements of these stars and are measured in milliarcseconds. The star is moving -34.54 ± 0.30 miliarcseconds/year towards the north and 107.60 ± 0.51 miliarcseconds/year east if we saw them in the horizon.
Kleeia has a spectral type of A2IV. This means the star is a blue subgiant star. The star is 7442.00000000 Parsecs from the Galactic Centre or terms of Light Years is 24273.0760604800000000s. The star has a B-V Colour Index of 0.04 which means the star's temperature has been calculated using information from Morgans @ Uni.edu at being 9,025 Kelvin.
Kleeia Radius has been calculated as being 2.39 times bigger than the Sun.The Sun's radius is 695,800km, therefore the star's radius is an estimated 1,661,435.15.km. However with the 2007 release of updated Hipparcos files, the radius is now calculated at being round 2.40. The figure is derived at by using the formula from SDSS and has been known to produce widely incorrect figures. The star's Iron Abundance is 0.20 with an error value of 9.99 Fe/H with the Sun has a value of 1 to put it into context.
Kleeia has an apparent magnitude of 4.30 which is how bright we see the star from Earth. Apparent Magnitude is also known as Visual Magnitude. If you used the 1997 Parallax value, you would get an absolute magnitude of 1.02 If you used the 2007 Parallax value, you would get an absolute magnitude of 1.01. Magnitude, whether it be apparent/visual or absolute magnitude is measured by a number, the smaller the number, the brighter the Star is. Our own Sun is the brightest star and therefore has the lowest of all magnitudes, -26.74. A faint star will have a high number.
Using the original Hipparcos data that was released in 1997, the parallax to the star was given as 22.05 which gave the calculated distance to Kleeia as 147.92 light years away from Earth or 45.35 parsecs. It would take a spaceship travelling at the speed of light, 147.92 years to get there. We don't have the technology or spaceship that can carry people over that distance yet.
In 2007, Hipparcos data was revised with a new parallax of 21.96 which put Kleeia at a distance of 148.53 light years or 45.54 parsecs. It should not be taken as though the star is moving closer or further away from us. It is purely that the distance was recalculated.
The star's Galacto-Centric Distance is 7,442.00 Parsecs or 24,273.08 Light Years. The Galacto-Centric Distance is the distance from the star to the Centre of the Galaxy which is Sagittarius A*.
The source of the information if it has a Hip I.D. is from Simbad, the Hipparcos data library based at the University at Strasbourg, France. Hipparcos was a E.S.A. satellite operation launched in 1989 for four years. The items in red are values that I've calculated so they could well be wrong. Information regarding Metallicity and/or Mass is from the E.U. Exoplanets. The information was obtained as of 12th Feb 2017.
|Bayer Designation||Delta-3 Tauri|
|Alternative Name(s)||Delta-3 Tau,68 Tauri, Cleeia|
|Hipparcos Library I.D.||20648|
|Bonner Durchmusterung||BD+17 719|
|Henry Draper Designation||27962|
|Star Type||subgiant star|
|Absolute Magnitude||1.02 / 1.01|
|Visual / Apparent Magnitude||4.30|
|Naked Eye Visible||Yes - Magnitudes|
|Right Ascension (R.A.)||04h 25m 29.32|
|Galactic Latitude||-21.29 degrees|
|Galactic Longitude||178.12 degrees|
|1997 Distance from Earth||22.05 Parallax (milliarcseconds)|
|147.92 Light Years|
|2007 Revised Distance from Earth||21.96 Parallax (milliarcseconds)|
|148.53 Light Years|
|Galacto-Centric Distance||24,273.08 Light Years / 7,442.00 Parsecs|
|Proper Motion Dec.||-34.54 ± 0.30 milliarcseconds/year|
|Proper Motion RA.||107.60 ± 0.51 milliarcseconds/year|
|Radial Velocity||39.00 ± 0.10 km/s|
|Iron Abundance||0.20 ± 9.99 Fe/H|
|Calculated Effective Temperature||9,025 Kelvin|
The star has been identified as being a multi-star system, one in which there is at least one star in close orbit to another star or two or more stars orbiting a central point. The stars may be of equal mass, unequal mass where one star is stronger than the other or be in groups orbiting a central point which doesn't necessarily have to be a star. More information can be found on my dedicated multiple star systems page. The source of the info is Simbad. The file is dated 2000 so any differences between this and any other source will be down to the actual source from where the information came from.
|Proper Motion mas/yr|
|H.D. Id||B.D. Id||Star Code||Magnitude||R.A.||Dec.||Spectrum||Colour||Year|
The map was generated using Night Vision, an awesome free application by Brian Simpson.